🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and families are observing closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring comparable bans.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". The policy could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to approve a bill lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended parents to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is provided. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good foundation," commented one MEP supporting the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, momentum built behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. One foundation founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering harmful social media material contends that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to create tools that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a influential peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the local level amid country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted laws demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some figures to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond the West, additional countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global organizations adopt a more cautious position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve user protection.

As this international discussion unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and its followers indicate that governments around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.